Executive checklist
Use this first-pass list to expose missing decisions. The detailed sections below explain why each area matters and how to review it.
- Item 1: Define the business process and product owner
- Item 2: Confirm clouds, editions, licences and environments
- Item 3: Model users, permissions and sharing
- Item 4: Profile migration volume and data quality
- Item 5: Classify every integration by behavior
- Item 6: Choose configuration, Flow or Apex deliberately
- Item 7: Inventory limits and expected workload
- Item 8: Plan testing and deployment governance
- Item 9: Budget training, administration and support
- Item 10: Define adoption and operational measures
How to interrogate every checklist item
Do not mark an item complete because it has been discussed. For each one, capture the five records below. This separates an informed decision from an optimistic assumption and gives delivery, security and business owners the same reference point.
- Current evidence
- What was observed, measured, reproduced or approved? Name the artifact, system or accountable source.
- Decision and boundary
- What is being chosen now, which alternative was rejected, and what remains deliberately outside this decision?
- Failure and exception path
- What can make the normal path invalid, how will people recognise it, and who may intervene or approve an exception?
- Acceptance evidence
- Which observable behaviour, test, reconciliation or owner review will prove that the implemented result matches the decision?
- Owner and review trigger
- Who owns the decision after launch, when must it be reviewed, and which product, data, threat, provider or operating change should reopen it?
Section 01
Licence price is not implementation cost
A Salesforce programme includes platform subscriptions and the work required to make the platform fit a governed business process. Configuration, data migration, integration, automation, security, testing, deployment, training and support can materially affect total cost.
Confirm products, editions, user types, sandboxes, add-ons and contractual assumptions directly with Salesforce or an authorized seller. Treat public pricing as an input, not a full delivery estimate.
Section 02
Process scope determines delivery scope
Map the sales, service or operational process before objects and screens. Name participants, decisions, exceptions, approvals, records and reporting needs. Configuration can reproduce a weak process as easily as a strong one.
Prioritize a coherent first release and identify which regions, teams, products and historical records are included. Unstated rollout breadth is a frequent source of cost and schedule change.
Section 04
Control customization and platform limits
Use standard capability where it clearly satisfies the requirement, Flow for suitable automation and Apex or external services where code-level control is justified. Record why custom behavior exists and how it will be tested and maintained.
Expected data volume, automation fan-out and integration traffic should be reviewed against platform limits. A small demonstration does not expose the behavior of bulk operations or concurrent work.
Section 05
Budget adoption and day-two operation
Include training, data stewardship, report ownership, release administration, monitoring and a governed enhancement backlog. Deployment does not create adoption, and adoption should not be claimed without evidence.
Compare proposals on a shared scope and responsibility matrix. Ask what is excluded, which assumptions change price and what access, documentation and handover the organization retains.
Decision workbook
Turn the article into a reviewable next step
The framework becomes useful when it changes a real decision. Work through these stages with the people who own the business process, data, technology and release, not only the person writing the specification.
- 01
Frame the decision
Write one sentence naming the operating problem, the people affected, the decision required now and the date or event that makes it necessary. Add explicit exclusions. If the sentence contains several independent outcomes, split the decision before evaluating solutions.
- 02
Build an evidence register
List confirmed facts, reported facts, assumptions and unknowns separately. Attach a source, owner and review date. Reproduce important technical behaviour where possible, and label estimates or illustrative examples so they cannot silently become contractual facts.
- 03
Compare viable options
Include the smallest safe change and the option to retain the current path. Compare user value, operating ownership, data and security consequences, reversibility, dependencies, cost basis and time-to-evidence. Avoid a weighted score that hides a non-waivable constraint.
- 04
Define observable acceptance
Describe successful behaviour, negative and permission cases, data reconciliation, degraded behaviour, operational visibility and owner sign-off. A feature list is not acceptance evidence; the review must show that the surrounding workflow remains safe and usable.
- 05
Sequence learning and risk
Resolve architecture-changing, data-purpose, integration, migration and authority questions before investing in low-risk polish. Deliver the smallest coherent increment that can be demonstrated and operated, then use its evidence to approve or reshape the next increment.
Failure patterns this framework is designed to prevent
A requested feature is mistaken for the underlying need
The team delivers the named screen or integration while the real decision, exception or handoff remains unresolved. Trace every material feature back to the user action and operating result it supports.
An assumption acquires the status of a fact
Repeated wording in decks, tickets and code can make an unverified belief look approved. Keep source, confidence, owner and validation action visible until evidence closes it.
The happy path hides the operating cost
Demos omit retries, corrections, access reviews, reconciliation, support and recovery. Review failure and administrative paths before declaring the design production-ready.
A technical release is treated as a business outcome
Deployment can enable an outcome; it cannot guarantee adoption, revenue, regulatory approval or operational change. Assign the non-technical actions and measure them separately.
Ownership disappears at handover
A system with no accountable owner for accounts, data, incidents, dependencies, content and future decisions degrades even when the initial build is sound. Treat ownership and review cadence as deliverables, not post-launch administration.
From guidance to delivery
How SpeedInno applies this thinking
SpeedInno uses frameworks like this to make requirements, evidence, acceptance and operating ownership visible before committing to a delivery path. The right response may be a focused assessment, a controlled implementation, a takeover plan or a decision not to build yet; the framework supports the decision rather than forcing a predetermined package.
Explore the relevant capabilityEvidence base
Primary sources
These sources support the technical framework. They do not imply endorsement of SpeedInno or a commercial partnership.
Related capability